new faculty

Welcome, Prof. Elio König!

Posted on
profile photo of Elio König
Elio König

This fall, condensed matter theorist Elio König returned to Madison as an assistant professor of physics. König began his education in Germany and Italy, earning a PhD from the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in 2014. He joined UW–Madison physics as a postdoc with Alex Levchenko, then completed a second postdoc at Rutgers University. Most recently, König held a group leader position at the Max Planck Institute of Solid State Research in Stuttgart, Germany.

Please give an overview of your research.

I’m a condensed matter theorist, so I study the collective behavior of quantum particles in materials. We study electronic collective behavior — behavior of electronic systems — and I study strong correlations in that regard. We do all of this with an eye on what’s happening in the quantum computation world. Our study of quantum materials can serve as a source of inspiration for building useful quantum devices in the context of quantum computers and potentially beyond.

And then reversely, the advances in quantum technology are of great use in our studying of quantum materials. We can use them as new probes, as new experimental techniques, and at the same time there is theoretical and conceptual cross-pollination. I’m inspired by these synergies.

What are one or two main projects your group will work on first?

The main directions that I’m heading in right now are 2D materials and trying to work more into concepts related to or at the interface between quantum materials and quantum information.

In the 2D world, what I’m really fascinated by is frustrated magnetism in these 2D materials, and in particular research on quantum spin liquids. Generally, the idea is to study states of matter beyond the standard concept of spontaneous symmetry breaking. We’re interested in topologically ordered states and quantum order, which is essentially based on the entanglement of many, many particles together. And these states of matter are relevant for topological quantum error correction codes. I think there’s also quite a lot of interest at UW already, both theoretically but also particularly experimentally, in 2D materials and I hope to collaborate with my future colleagues in that regard.

On the side of quantum materials and quantum information theory, there are ongoing projects that I want to extend on. I want to look for new setups for very robust quantum computers and topological quantum computation. At the same time, I want to use devices which are available right now for emulation of quantum many body systems.

What attracted you to Madison and the university?

This question is related to the question: why am I coming back to the States? I very much enjoyed my five years in the States, personally but also scientifically. The main aspect that I find more present in the States than in Europe is a more visionary approach to science. And I think this is also true for UW, so this is something that attracted me to UW. I know the department maybe better than other new faculty and it’s a fantastic place to work. I know that there are very inspiring colleagues, and I hope that there will be a chance to collaborate with them. And finally, Madison is a very nice place to live. I think it’s probably the nicest city of this size that I’ve seen in the States.

What is your favorite element and or elementary particle? [editor’s note: this interview was conducted via Zoom while König was on a cycling trip through the Italian Alps]  

I read some previous interviews, so I knew this question was coming. And when I was biking today, I was thinking about it. Given that I’m mountain biking in the Alps and it’s really intense, I decided that oxygen is the element I want to go for. I can’t get enough of it right now. Oxygen is of course a symbol for the life that humans and animals have on this planet. Finally, oxygen is also a symbol for the advances of science and scientific revolutions, for example Lavoisier’s pioneering work in this regard.

What hobbies and interests do you have?

I really enjoy biking — mountain biking and gravel biking in particular. This is the third time that I’m transversing the Alps. I got very much into dancing in the last three years in Stuttgart. I still dance forró, or Brazilian couple dancing, from time to time. I also like playing sports, particularly soccer and squash.

Welcome, Roman Kuzmin, the Dunson Cheng Assistant Professor of Physics

Posted on
profile photo of Roman Kuzmin
Roman Kuzmin

In the modern, cutting-edge field of quantum computing, it can be a bit puzzling to hear a researcher relate their work to low-tech slide rules. Yet that is exactly the analogy that Roman Kuzmin uses to describe one of his research goals, creating quantum simulators to model various materials. He also studies superconducting qubits and ways to increase coherence in this class of quantum computer.

Kuzmin, a quantum information and condensed matter scientist, will join the department as an the Dunson Cheng Assistant Professor of Physics on January 1. He is currently a research scientist at the University of Maryland’s Joint Quantum Institute in College Park, Md, and recently joined us for an interview.

Can you please give an overview of your research?

My main fields are quantum information and condensed matter physics. For example, one of my interests is to solve complicated condensed matter problems using new techniques and materials which quantum information science developed. Also, it works in the other direction. I am also trying to improve materials which are used in quantum information. I work in the subfield of superconducting circuits. There are several different directions in quantum information, and the physics department at Wisconsin has many of them already, so I will complement work in the department.

Once you’re in Madison and your lab is up and running, what are the first big one or two big things you want to really focus your energy on? 

One is in quantum information and quantum computing. So, qubits are artificial atoms or building blocks of a quantum computer. I’m simplifying it, of course, but there are environments which try to destroy coherence. In order to scale up those qubits and make quantum computers larger and larger — because that’s what you need eventually to solve anything, to do something useful with it — you need to mitigate decoherence processes which basically prevent qubits from working long enough. So, I will look at the sources of those decoherence processes and try to make qubits live longer and be longer coherent.

A second project is more on the condensed matter part. I will build very large circuits out of Josephson junctions, inductors and capacitors, and such large circuits behave like some many-body objects. It creates a problem which is very hard to solve because it contains many parts, and these parts interact with each other such that the problem is much more complicated than just the sum of those parts.

What are some applications of your work?

Of course this work is interesting for developing theory and understanding our world. But the application, for example for the many-body system I just described, it’s called the quantum impurity. One of my goals is to use this to create a simulator which can potentially model some useful material. It’s like if you have a quantum computer, you can write a program and it will solve something for you. A slide rule is a physical device that allows you to do complicated, logarithmic calculations, but it’s designed to do only this one calculation. I’m creating kind of a quantum slide rule.

What is your favorite element and/or elementary particle? 

So, I have my favorite circuit element: Josephson junction. (editor’s note: the question did not specify atomic element, so we appreciate this clever answer!). And for elementary particle, the photon, especially microwave photons, because that’s what I use in these circuits to do simulations. They’re very versatile and they’re just cool.

What hobbies and interests do you have?

I like reading, travelling, and juggling.

Welcome, Professor Lu Lu!

Posted on
Lu Lu

New UW–Madison assistant professor of physics Lu Lu’s research program combines the past with the future. Her research looks for sources of ultrahigh energy particles, which is done by analyzing data that has already been collected. As she says, “Maybe data is already talking to us, we just haven’t looked.” But she is also working toward improving future data collection, which will require more technologically-advanced detectors. “My teachers, my great masters, have taught me that the current young generation has the responsibility to look into new techniques to go to the future for younger generations to proceed forward,” she says about her work in sensor R&D.

On January 1, Professor Lu joined the Department of Physics and IceCube. Most recently, she was a postdoctoral fellow at the International Center for Hadron Astrophysics at Chiba University in Japan. To welcome her, we sat down for a (virtual) interview.

What are your research interests?

My prime interest is astroparticle physics, and my ultimate goal is to find the sources of the highest energy particles in the universe. These particles carry energy of about 1020 electronvolts. This is higher energy than what we have from the Large Hadron Collider and human technologies. The real attractiveness here is we don’t know how nature accelerates these particles. And once we identify the sources, we can test new theories beyond the Standard Model using sources crated by nature.

What are one or two main projects you focus your research on? 

I’m involved in two experiments. One is IceCube, the other is Pierre Auger Observatory. I was doing cosmic ray analysis, but cosmic rays are usually charged particles and they are deflected in the magnetic field of the galaxy; they would not travel in a straight line. IceCube studies neutrinos which are neutral particles, they travel directly from the source. Pierre Auger detects ultrahigh energy photons, which are also neutral particles. One thing I want to do immediately after I join Madison is to combine these two experiments to do a joint analysis. We have photon candidates but we haven’t really tried to connect them in the multimessenger regime. By combining Pierre Auger photons with IceCube neutrinos, we could possibly find a transient source, a source that doesn’t constantly emit ultrahigh energy photons or neutrinos but all of a sudden there’s a flare. This type of analysis has never been done, but we have data on disks.

The second thing I’m interested in is using new sensor technologies. In IceCube, we have Gen2 being planned right now. Instead of using a single photon sensor, we’d use a more sensitive design and R&D. UW–Madison is taking the lead of designing this future detector. There’s also radio technology. So, to detect the highest energy neutrinos we need to build a large instrument volume. With optical array, it is really hard to scale up because one has to drill holes inside the South Pole, which is really expensive. But radio technology doesn’t have to go so deep, so they can bury their detectors on the surface areas, and the radiowaves can transmit further away than the optical photons in ice. For optical you have to make the detectors very dense, but for radio you can make the antennas further apart, so that means you can have a larger area and detect more events easily. I think radio is the way to go for the future.

You said you have a lot of data collected already and just need to analyze it. How do you analyze the data from these detectors?

We would have to search for photon candidates from the data from Auger, and identify where it comes from and what the time this event happened. Correspondingly, do we see neutrinos from IceCube coming from the same direction and at the same time? Because you can never be sure it’s a photon. It could be a proton. We then want to build a statistical framework to combine different multimessengers together in real time.

What does it mean if you find a photon in coincidence with a neutrino? 

Cosmic rays were first detected more than 100 years ago, and there’s a rich history of studying where they come from. The mystery of origins still remains today because our poor knowledge on the galactic/extragalactic magnetic fields and mass composition of cosmic rays. In my opinion, the most probable way to solve this puzzle is to use neutral particles. If we can identify ultrahigh energy photons in coincidence with neutrinos, that is a smoking gun that we are actually looking at a source and we can finally pin down where in the universe is accelerating high energy particles. And therefore, we can study particle physics maybe beyond Standard Model. It’s just like a lab created by the universe to test particle physics.

What is your favorite element and/or elementary particle? 

My favorite elementary particle is the electron anti-neutrino. I like muons, too. My favorite element is hydrogen.

What hobbies and interests do you have?

I’m afraid I’ll disappoint you because my hobby is related to my research: Augmented reality. When I heard about something called Microsoft Hololens, I thought, I could make IceCube a hologram. I bought these special glasses, and then made a program on it and used it for some outreach events. But the glasses are very expensive, so people said, “Okay we can’t buy hologram glasses.” So I moved it to mobile phones so that everyone could look at it for fun. It’s called IceCubeAR (note: download it for iPhones or Android phones). I made it with a group of friends in Tokyo.